What kind of practitioner am I now?

When I started level 3, I had not yet fully realized that my learning path would not have the characteristics of levels one and two. 

Level 3 is about me not as a student, but as a practitioner: what kind of practitioner I am and will become is totally up to me.

Level 3 is the growth path that I will do to develop myself in the discipline of photography, according to what interests me most. 

As a start, I combined my love for street and urban photography with the localization of similar currents of thought and art. I started from the "theory of drift", of which I had seen some traces in the previous units, and I arrived at the psychogeography, the wanderer, the flaneur, the ley lines.

These themes define the boundaries within which I will move, research, reflect, express myself, and complete my practice.

I can define myself now as an "emerging practitioner", also because I am in a phase of my life where my professional activity prevents me from dedicating myself totally to photography, at a level that I could define more than passion. 

At the same time, I am aware of the fact that the path to level three asks me more: to act in order to become an established creative practitioner: my goal is to make the moment in which I retire from my professional activity coincide with that in which my passion will become an established creative practice.